Harvest aid application decisions in cotton

Share Tweet Email

The use of harvest aid products is a common practice in cotton production in the U.S. Cotton Belt to prepare the crop for harvest and optimize lint yield and fiber quality. Harvest aid categories include boll openers, defoliants, desiccants, and regrowth inhibitors.

Harvest aid timing

The timing of harvest aid applications relative to crop maturity is essential. Several methods exist to determine crop maturity and defoliation readiness, including counting nodes above the highest cracked boll and the percentage of open bolls. When using the method of counting nodes above the highest cracked boll, the common recommendation is either 4 or 5 nodes above the cracked boll (NACB). However, waiting until 4-5 NACB is often too late in this thermally-limited region, where the first fall freeze of the season typically occurs in mid to late October (Figure 1).
 

A map of the state of kansasDescription automatically generated
Figure 1. Average fall freeze dates. Courtesy of the Kansas State Weather Data Library.


To count NACB, find your top mature boll in the first fruiting position that is just splitting (not fully open), and count the number of mainstem nodes above it to the top of the plant. If that number is 4 or less, you’re ready to go. If the number is greater than 4, any boll above that is likely to be less mature than you would like (ideally).
 

A diagram of a plant with textDescription automatically generated
Figure 2. Determining nodes above cracked boll (NACB). Source: Guthrie, D., Cothren, T., and Snipes, C. 1993. The Art and Science of Defoliation. Cotton Physiology Today Volume 4, No. 7, National Cotton Council, Cordova, TN.
 

Currently, the most common method used in Kansas is timing harvest-aid applications based on percentage open bolls. Typically, harvest-aids are applied at 60% open bolls (Figure 3). However, Kansas cotton growers have been surprised to see applications at 20% or even 10% open bolls result in no or minimal differences in lint quality. However, these early harvest aid applications could have a negative effect on the cotton seed weight and payment received for cotton seed, which is often 15 to 20% of total gross returns from a cotton crop. In Kansas, the value of the cottonseed is typically used to cover, at least in part, the cost of ginning with the remainder paid to the producer, referred to as seed credit.
 

A cotton plant with leavesDescription automatically generated
Figure 3. Open cotton boll. Photo by Logan Simon, K-State Research & Extension.


Immature cotton seeds may have lower seed weights as well as lower oil and protein concentrations. With this in mind, another method for timing harvest aid applications is monitoring the seed maturity of the uppermost harvestable bolls. In this case, the decision to apply harvest aids occurs when the uppermost harvestable bolls have mature seeds (seed coats have turned black) (Figure 3).
 

A close-up of a fruitDescription automatically generated
Figure 4. Cotton boll with mature seeds (seed coats have turned black). Photo courtesy of Rex Friesen, Southern Kansas Cotton Growers.


Harvest aid products

In addition to timing, Kansas cotton producers must also decide about harvest-aid product selection and sequence. Several products are available as harvest aids in cotton (Table 1.) In Kansas, harvest aids are typically applied in two sequential applications. The most common and least expensive strategy used for rainfed cotton is the application of 32-40 oz/A Prep (Ethephon, a boll opener) with 3-4 oz/A Gramoxone (Paraquat, a desiccant) followed by 16-24 oz/A Gramoxone 10-14 days later. For irrigated cotton, which typically has a denser canopy than rainfed cotton, the most common strategy is the application of 32-40 oz/A Prep with 3 oz/A Folex (S, S, S-Tributyl phosphorotrithioate, a defoliant) followed by 16-24 oz/A Gramoxone 10-14 days later. This strategy is less common for rainfed cotton, mostly due to the increased expense associated with Folex.


Table 1. Cotton percent defoliation 14 days after application of harvest aid treatments at Mount Hope and Bently, KS, in 2023.

 

 

 

Product

 

Percent open bolls

50%

75%

Rate
(Ounces a.i./acre)

Mount Hope
(% defoliation)

Aim

0.2

78

80

 

0.4

60

81

Folex

11

75

86

Reviton

0.3

85

84

 

0.9

80

85

Sharpen

0.3

75

90

 

0.6

68

93

 

 

 

Bently
(% defoliation)

Aim

0.2

87

96

 

0.4

86

93

Folex

11

86

97

Reviton

0.3

96

98

 

0.9

95

95

Sharpen

0.3

98

99

 

0.6

99

99

Aim, carfentrazone; Folex, Tributyl phosphorotrithioate; Reviton, Tiafenacil; Sharpen, Saflufenacil. All treatments included Prep (Ethephon) at 18 oz a.i./acre as a boll opener.

Other considerations for harvest aid application

Spray coverage is key, with carrier volume being critically important. Increased carrier volume provides greater coverage and more rapid and effective defoliation and boll opening. Nozzle tips that produce coarse to medium-fine droplet sizes are recommended for optimum coverage. Slower ground speed also typically allows for better coverage and deeper penetration through the crop canopy. Most boll opener labels will outline rate suggestions based on temperature ranges. Refer to the label of your specific boll opener selection for details.

The use of trade names is for clarity to readers and does not imply endorsement of a particular product, nor does exclusion imply non-approval. Always consult the herbicide label for the most current use requirements.

 

Logan Simon, Southwest Area Agronomist, Garden City
lsimon@ksu.edu

Sarah Lancaster, Extension Weed Management Specialist
slancaster@ksu.edu


Tags:  cotton harvest aid 

Search
Subscribe