K-State’s Ecology and Agriculture Spatial Analysis Laboratory (EASAL) produces weekly Vegetation Condition Report maps. These maps can be a valuable tool for making crop selection and marketing decisions.
Two short videos of Dr. Kevin Price explaining the development of these maps can be viewed on YouTube at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRP3Y5NIggw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUdOK94efxc
The objective of these reports is to provide users with a means of assessing the relative condition of crops and grassland. The maps can be used to assess current plant growth rates, as well as comparisons to the previous year and relative to the 25-year average. The report is used by individual farmers and ranchers, the commodities market, and political leaders for assessing factors such as production potential and drought impact across their state.
NOTE TO READERS: The maps below represent a subset of the maps available from the EASAL group. If you’d like digital copies of the entire map series please contact Nan An at nanan@ksu.edu and we can place you on our email list to receive the entire dataset each week as they are produced. The maps are normally first available on Wednesday of each week, unless there is a delay in the posting of the data by EROS Data Center where we obtain the raw data used to make the maps. These maps are provided for free as a service of the Department of Agronomy and K-State Research and Extension.
The maps in this issue of the newsletter show the current state of photosynthetic activity in Kansas, the Corn Belt, and the continental U.S., with comments from Mary Knapp, service climatologist:
Figure 1. The Vegetation Condition Report for Kansas for April 1 – 14 from K-State’s Ecology and Agriculture Spatial Analysis Laboratory shows that vegetative activity is greatest in the South Central Division, where slightly warmer temperatures have resulted in further progress in the winter wheat. Low vegetative activity is particularly noticeable in parts of western Kansas, especially in the area from Wallace to Trego counties and in Hamilton County. This is due to a combination of dry conditions and the cooler temperatures.
Figure 2. Compared to the previous year at this time for Kansas, the current Vegetation Condition Report for April 1 – 14 from K-State’s Ecology and Agriculture Spatial Analysis Laboratory shows the greatest decrease in vegetative activity in the Central, East Central, and Southeastern Divisions. Northwest and west central Kansas have increased vegetative activity. For the west, this does not signal excessive plant activity; it is simply the fact that vegetative activity last year was extremely limited.
Figure 3. Compared to the 25-year average at this time for Kansas, this year’s Vegetation Condition Report for April 1 – 14 from K-State’s Ecology and Agriculture Spatial Analysis Laboratory shows the biggest area of below-average vegetative activity is in the North Central and Central Divisions. In North central Kansas, cooler temperatures have delayed plant development. In the Central Division, the cooler temperatures are compounded with extremely dry conditions.
Figure 4. The Vegetation Condition Report for the Corn Belt for April 1 – 14 from K-State’s Ecology and Agriculture Spatial Analysis Laboratory shows that the area of lowest vegetative activity is slowly moving northward, as the snow pack retreats. Cold temperatures have delayed field activities in the northern areas of the Corn Belt.
Figure 5. The comparison to last year in the Corn Belt for the period April 1 – 14 from K-State’s Ecology and Agriculture Spatial Analysis Laboratory shows much greater vegetative activity in parts of North Dakota, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. This is due mainly to the lower snow pack this year. In contrast, lower NDVI values are seen in the southern areas of region, due mainly to cooler-than-average temperatures.
Figure 6. Compared to the 25-year average at this time for the Corn Belt, this year’s Vegetation Condition Report for April 1 – 14 from K-State’s Ecology and Agriculture Spatial Analysis Laboratory shows that the greatest departure is along the northern Great Lakes, where lingering snow cover continues to delay development. Slighter decreases are seen in the southern portions of the region, where cooler air temperatures are the major influence. Impacts from the freezing temperatures during the April 13-15th period won’t be visible for several weeks.
Figure 7. The Vegetation Condition Report for the U.S. for April 1 – 14 from K-State’s Ecology and Agriculture Spatial Analysis Laboratory shows that the greatest vegetative activity is along the Gulf Coast and the Pacific Northwest. For the Gulf Coast, the combination of favorable temperatures and moisture has fueled plant development. Along the Pacific Northwest, especially into northern California, the lack of snow is evident in the higher NDVI values. In contrast, in areas of western Wyoming and central Colorado where snow cover is greater, low NDVI values are seen.
Figure 8. The U.S. comparison to last year at this time for the period April 1 – 14 from K-State’s Ecology and Agriculture Spatial Analysis Laboratory shows that the greatest increase in biomass activity is in the northern Plains and the Pacific Northwest. This is due primarily to decreased snow cover this year. For example, Itasca, ND reported no snow on the ground on the 13th of April this year. Last year, it reported 13 inches on the ground.
Figure 9. The U.S. comparison to the 25-year average for the period April 1 – 14 from K-State’s Ecology and Agriculture Spatial Analysis Laboratory shows that the contrast of winters continues to be visible in the northern parts of the country, with delayed vegetative activity in the east, and reduced snow cover in the west. In Texas, the contrast of areas that have had moisture versus those that haven’t is evident. Coriscana, southeast of Dallas, has seen 0.83 inches in April; Abilene, southwest of Dallas, has seen just 0.26 inches.
Mary Knapp, Agronomy, Weather Data Library
mknapp@ksu.edu
Kevin Price, Professor Emeritus, Agronomy and Geography, Remote Sensing, GIS
kpprice@ksu.edu
Nan An, Graduate Research Assistant, Ecology & Agriculture Spatial Analysis Laboratory (EASAL)
nanan@ksu.edu
Tags: